Wednesday, May 13, 2020
The perfect boss is called a leader - Wolfgang Career Executive Coaching
The perfect boss is called a leader - Wolfgang Career Executive Coaching âThe perfect bossâ, you say? Thereâs no such thing! When we think of a âbossâ, we think of someone who yells at you when youâre late, doesnât solicit your opinions and isnât very sensitive to your personal issues. Decades ago, this was the predominant management style. Today, things are starting to change. Weâve realized that engaged employees are motivated and highly productive. People managers, now, need to be supportive, exhibit patience, give constructive feedback and make a genuine connection with his/her employees. We often donât use the word âbossâ to describe that person. Rather, we say âleaderâ. So how can a boss make the transition to leader? To see how, just look at how Executive Coaching has changed over the years. Brief history of Executive Coaching In the beginning of my career as an Executive Coach, senior members of staff would be sent to coaching for âremedialâ behaviors, what was derisively called âcharm schoolâ. These were bosses that needed better communication skills. At that time, professional communication was called âsoft skillsâ (and some call it that to this day!) In the early 90s, the introduction of such people-centered models, such as Emotional Intelligence (EQ), changed the reputation of Executive Coaching and the desire for these services. EQ was one of the first models to respect how a leader was being, not only what they accomplished. Today, Executive Coaching is a respected field in which bosses can learn more effective behaviors of a leader. People want to be treated with respect; not ordered around. Workers who are respected are invited into the conversation instead of just being given a task. This leads to workers who are significantly more engaged and, in turn, happier and more productive. Similarly, my clients who are managers want to learn how to be more influential, authentic and inspiring. These leaders need and want to learn to âlet go of controlâ and support people in doing their jobs. Some bosses are concerned that they might lose their âpowerâ if they considered their peopleâs ideas and built relationships with them. What the perfect boss looks like Many of my Executive clients realize they need to be better leaders and have influence beyond their titles. Personally influential. They need to be self-aware and have the ability to read people, empathize and draw the best out of their people. I call this, the perfect boss. A great example of a leader putting his trust in his employees comes from the CBS history of Ken Chenault, 17-year CEO of American Express. Hereâs my own recent example of a blossoming client, I will call Phil, and his transition to the perfect boss well, his journey there! The not-so-perfect boss When I first met Phil and he described why he was âsentâ to Executive Coaching, I was shocked at the blame he focused on his direct reports for his problems. He was trying his best to âtell themâ what they needed to do and he had nothing but resistance. This Senior VP was very clear and specific how reports and proposals and anything else should be done. Why canât they get it?, he barked! Phil had no awareness of the fact that his behavior was provoking the resistance of his people. When they brought him a project that didnât meet his expectations, he would ask âWhy did youâ or âYou should haveâ They wanted to be independent thinkers, share their ideas, and contribute; not just be âworker beesâ. His questions made them feel belittled. Even if he just said, âOk, well, it would be better ifâ his comments felt negative and critical. I asked Phil if he ever asked his people, âwhat do you think?â or âwhat other options are there?â He seemed shocked that those types of questions could work to get a different outcome that suited him more! I recommended my favorite âtext bookâ for communication, Smart Work: The Syntax Guide to Influence. The structure of communication in Smart Work aligns with Emotional Intelligence. The approach for professional communicators is that the meaning of your communication is the response you get or the effect it has. This means you may no longer blame others, when your communication doesnât get you the outcome you wanted. You must be more creative and flexible. Over the next few sessions, Phil devoured the book. We made a plan that he would write down what new behaviors and questions he tried, what worked and what didnât seem to work when dealing with one of his more âdifficultâ and âgrumpyâ reports, in particular. Phil was diligent and candid in reporting his work, even when he wasnât as successful as he would like. He still âunlearned and learned.â Change your connection to your people The truth is that sometimes people are âdifficultâ and âgrumpyâ but you canât change them. You can only change your approach and see what happens to move toward your goals. What surprised Phil the most is that if he doesnât get caught up in the âattitudeâ and keeps his eye on the goal, asking useful, not blaming questions, his employees started to change! One employee said, Wow! We never expected this result from Phil! He feels the difference between his âboss selfâ and his leader behaviors now. Heâs striving to be the perfect boss â" that leader who is capable of so much more. And his grumpy employee is bringing initiative to his projects, while Phil is accepting his ideas often and they have conversations that move toward their mutual goals. Thatâs how you get work doneâ"through people! Bosses dont think that way but leaders do. By Diane Dean|2018-09-16T03:57:36+00:00September 13th, 2018|Performance|0 Comments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.